<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taurino Notarpanaro 1999</title>
	<atom:link href="http://empiricalvino.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/taurino-notarpanaro-1999/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://empiricalvino.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/taurino-notarpanaro-1999/</link>
	<description>pinpointing the character and value of red wines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derick</title>
		<link>http://empiricalvino.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/taurino-notarpanaro-1999/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://empiricalvino.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/taurino-notarpanaro-1999/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>1999 wasn&#039;t nearly as good as 1997 -- I was really disappointed -- but the &#039;01s are just appearing on the market, so I&#039;d give it another chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1999 wasn&#8217;t nearly as good as 1997 &#8212; I was really disappointed &#8212; but the &#8217;01s are just appearing on the market, so I&#8217;d give it another chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
